>>40167194Fauna would be incredible, for different reasons than the others, but that's true of every one of them, of course.
Fauna specifically? She's a girl who screams "holding on" to me. That's hard to explain quickly, but the best way I can put it is that she'd be deep into the physical contact. As always, I'm assuming this is a scenario where you're in a loving relationship (as it should always be), and in that scenario, her "love language" is less built on words, and more built on physicality.
When you're having sex, she's hugging you. She's pulling you in for kisses. She's making little expressions between moans and kisses to ask you to keep going, or to move differently, but she's quick to pull you back in for more contact. The more you use your hands, the more ecstatic she gets, especially stuff like holding or rubbing the nape of her neck while kissing her. She's leg-locking, she's fully embracing you, the sense of self you both have almost feels like it starts to melt away as your bodies and spirits entangle together.
But what's practically as good is the aftercare. The "hanging on" feeling still applies. Fauna would be the type to keep clinging to you, wanting to fall asleep with you still inside of her, still hugging, or just staying in bed with each other for hours, softly kissing and telling each other how much you love her, and how she loves you. In a way, it's dangerous to be with her in this scenario: you'd never really WANT to leave her side. She'd be like the personification of "being woken up to find out it was a snow day." The feeling of wanting to hold onto every minute of extra time in bed that you have, but with a person.
>>40167208>>40167249>>40167386You people are pushing me to the brink, I need to keep the equilibrium of horny and cognizant mind to write these and the more I write the more the Id and the desire is taking me over, but fuck it, I'll do my best