>>68029350>because they don't have 12k membersIt's pretty clear that they do, unless you're assuming that a 5.9k poll (the most recent one) indicates that they have a really high poll retention rate compared to most.
>link to a single member postYou haven't asked me to. But here.
>check their numbersAt the time, I was not in an argument with a really, really mad anon. Going off of memory was fine for that purpose. Keep seething though.