>>43250061Imagine you have a store that sells fruit, imagine you print 100 tickets, imagine that you say "anyone that buys my ticket will get 1% of the profits I make in my store" and you hold the majority of the tickets (over 50%) and therefore you earn most of the profits, then if your store has good profits then people will want to buy your tickets to get a piece of the pie, and the more profitable your store (or the more profitable it looks) the higher you could sell those tickets and you could use the money of those tickets to invest in your store to make it more profitable.
Now, imagine that your name is Riku and you sell over 50% because you want to cash out, people will notice that your store has too many employees and not so good revenue and you keep employing more people but grow is not showing, well, the value of your tickets will decline, and so does the money you will get from those tickets, which could be pretty bad if you spend on luxury and unnecessary stuff and you end up in debt and you depend on the money the tickets sales generate to keep things moving like paying salaries or paying for events instead of canceling them, so in order to keep trust you could choose to give the majority holders decision power on how to run your store so they don't fucking sell, as it is their money invested in your store and they seek to get profits, which could lead to them to make the most souless decisions because they will aim at low risk stuff or worse, they would jump to the trend of listening to trannies in twitter about how they should force inclusion and stuff.
