>>68533889Damn, if it's a fake then that's incredibly clever. That said, they would still have to have reacted to something with at least two accounts, even if "Scarle" would have to have a duplicate account so it could be used to write the messages.
>>68534020They would also have to get the artifacting to be consistent. I've been taking a look at it so I could understand why the third section is blurred but I can't figure out why they would do it. Even the artifacts of the third image have been blurred and seem to have newer artifacts on top.
And as a reminder, when you post images to 4chan they don't normally get compressed, so there shouldn't be any artifacting introduced by the leaker when posting it to /vt/.
