>>2174717Well, there's two options.
>people post retarded shit for (you)s, thus, flaggers>people genuinely believe what they say when they post their retarded shit, but no one wants to claim them as their ownAnd if no one wants to claim them as their own, then it's fair to not take them into account as worthwhile representatives of their community. So even if they don't want to be called flaggers, there would be no functional difference.
It's well established that if you don't like someone, it's a lot more productive to simply be positive about someone you do like instead. That's why so many decent JP fans came around here after November, to get to that atmosphere over the old one.
