>>52692511>>52686860Wow these turn out pretty cool, lots of energy. I think the duet tag helped make the fun poses.
https://files.catbox.moe/kr9z2k.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/mday28.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/vedao3.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/xrfjz7.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/ankuso.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/m6mqz4.pngAI, why you make double pic like that, you hinting on something?
https://files.catbox.moe/lb7ruq.pngAnd double fisting mics...
https://files.catbox.moe/qdokp4.png>>52693467>so please don't be offended if you're a ProNope as layman as it gets. I'm just bashing models together like a caveman and then looking at the results and seeing if it still knows my sex stuff.
Yes I've read BBWM anons stuff a few months back, goes over my head. I think I saved a picture of the various slider settings on MBW and what is should control, but intimidated with all the settings. Suppose it'll come down to putting in the time (and not prompting) and careful tracking and documenting.
>>52694817So you're saying with enough time and tinkering with weights one can take a model and slowly weed away undesirable things like fucked up hands, unoptimized lighting etc... and replace them with another models' good hands and other stuff?
Will the only way to know if there are improvement is to prompt and visually inspect the result and write it down?
Definitely sounds like a labour of love if your goal is to hone and shape the perfect model.
>>52694234Sanallites man... lucky bastards
Good night
