>>53825274No, asserting a claim based on what you say is the opinion of any majority of ANY demographic (reducing the scope of the demographic to a more niche one for the sake of this particular argument, must, logically, reduce the range of what is considered argumentum ad populum in a correlative matter to that reduction as well) is textbook argumentum ad populum, regardless of whether that fact makes you feel stupid or not. Also, unlike that seething femoid, I've never called "all women" foids, nor have I even once implied that all women are foids. Also, unlike that seething femoid, you can look through all of my posts in this exchange and not find one even (1) example of me applying the descriptor to any woman but her. Women are not foids; that particular woman is a foid.
Looks like you're not cut out for this whole debate thing, buddy. Maybe come back after you've had a bit more practice.