>>36408792>>36409140>I am channeling Founder's gnome energy, but alas it is not I.Now hold on a minute there, partner. We can make sense of this. I'm sure we can.
So in this case, "Founder" would not be a physical being, but a concept instead. A concept anyone can embody. So now we have a split between the being that we know as "Founder" and this concept of "Founder". Without embodying the concept of what is "Founder", said being is not actually "Founder", but is still the physical being behind it. THEREFORE, one can at the same time be "Channeling Founder's gnome energy" but because he does not yet embody the concept, "Alas, it is not I". So, this is a being that has, up until now, been the "Founder" we know, but at this precise moment in time, is not the "Founder" concept, due to whatever reason.