>>12726796Let me spell it out for you:
Thread is about "virtual rape" (that's how many anons here see it). Words like "victim" are used (see:
>>12719682), an anon points out that the word "rape" is thrown out a lot, I say it's bad when these people say it because no crime even happened, you say this means the word should be used more(?), I say it's not the same when we use it vs. known personalities online using it, you ask who, I say who, then you ask how it's relevant.
It's relevant because it furthers my argument that any time someone online says they or someone else was raped, their definition of it is usually bullshit, which is why they shouldn't say it because anyone who might have ACTUALLY been assaulted may be looked over. Boy who cried wolf, etc.