>>34538750It's the other way around, mate, now it's your time to shine.
Wanna know something interesting? Up until late 19th century most of the paintings were valued for being realistic with a good painter being one that could faithfully represent reality.
Then photography was invented and then there was a mechanical way to represent reality, to take portraits and landscape pictures.
Artists could no longer compete with a mechanical machine capable of make a photorealistic representation of any scene in mere minutes, then seconds, then milliseconds.
Instead of restricting what artists could do, it had the OPPOSITE effect. Now freed from the constraints of representing reality, they could innovate and imagine and express and impress and dream and a lot of the *early* 20th century art movements were born from that.
AI won't kill the artist, it will free them from being "wet robots drawing the same thing over and over and over and over"
