>>35095906I understand where you're coming from, truly. I think all of what you said is valid, but I stilll think it comes from a place of (willful) ignorance. I'm not outright suggesting for you to start consuming that content if that's not what you want, but I implore you to take a more open-minded approach since I interpret it as you having some preconceived notions based on the past. Bottom line: she can't be one without being the other first and foremost.