>>58667414I answered. It would look better if it was smaller. I don't know how to properly explain, it's just a feeling. I have an itch inside, it tells me to make that picture smaller.
Like, this piccute, it's huge, originally, it's ~4600x2300. But it's expertly shaded and has decent amount of detail. That resolution is justified, to preserve it. And no offence to that anon, but there's no detail to preserve on his pic. I'm sure the veins on that cock will look just as good at half that resolution.
>>58667726Don't be ridiculous, Cheeb deserves to be posted at 8k.