>>48033182>Just because a bad mutation is uncommonit's not uncommon
>that doesnt make it goodit doesn't have to be good to have evolved, that's not how evolution works. I never even said it was good, just that it's natural so appealing to whatever is natural as being good doesn't work as an argument against it.
> You may not agree with the "fairytales" but in the end they made the west prosperthe west certainly wasn't prospering during the dark ages for hundreds of years when people lived in abject misery due to religious governance, nor have institutions like the catholic church done much to progress or improve civillisation, if not in fact holding it back severely. Sure, the foundations of classical liberalism and humanism were built out of the framework of christian morals however the majority of advancements in civillization were brought about by science and the enlightenment. And besides, religion currently in the world today - especially islam - is absolutely not improving society of the lives of anyone.
> Remove that and see how the society slowly crumblesno free democratic liberal society in history has crumbled - plenty of authoritarian and theocratic ones have however. The evidence is not in your favor.
>Most people need to be ruled by some sort of beliefsI will never accept that people must be ruled by parasites such as religion, tradition or cultural norms; freedom is and will always be the better option. A man chooses, a slave obeys.
