>>39269230>>39269374I think we all agree on that. A story is allowed to be as biased or unreliable as it wants to be.
>>39269609Stories are lore only as far as an objective and clear cut Yes and No can be taken from them, or at least that's how I view it. Lore as I understand it, is representative of a clear cut truth about a thing, event, or place, even if you write something like "some have varying views on whether or not such and such occured" that is still lore in terms of describing the views of people rather than an event itself.
A story can represent pieces of canonical lore but I don't see stories themselves as being equal or substitutable with lore due to the confusion that would occur in terms of how different things can be interpreted based on whose point of view it comes from.
>>39269679Not sure. Don't really care.
