>>66836381the problem with that comparison is the amount of people involved
imagine if VShojo had 50 members instead and a specific member was the only one that had active discussion when they went live (even if they were live at the same time as other members). you see maybe one or two posts about each of these other 49 members' streams throughout the course of the entire thread and nothing more, with any attempt to engage in further discussion about them not resulting in anything because any attempt to post about them gets overshadowed by 15 posts in a row about some insignificant thing that happened in that one big member's stream.
it's a case that to me pretty clearly shows they could have a thread of their own with absolute ease, especially when it's obvious there are other viewers in that thread interested in talking but they don't because why post when you know you're just going to be shouting into the void (or they leave because they know the thread will just get dominated by one member at that slot)
either way, I'm gonna drop this since it's dumb to keep metaposting about a different general here even if it's a related one
