>>19250749Did the original anon give an in-depth description of the flag when he posted it?
It takes a lot of time to look at and effort to figure out what's going on. Aren't flags supposed to be simple?
It's not a bad flag, now that I've taken the actual time to look at it, but it could use a manual(?) of sort.
>>19251902That anon has a right to "sperg" about his flag, given the amount of work they put into it.
Is that also the anon who made the military videos with music? I can't say I enjoyed those, but the flag is alright.
