>>54775560Wow, surprisingly, a sane /gem/ enjoyer, though I'm not really who to judge "thanks to" the behaviour of the /bj/ fans a couple of threads ago when I was sleeping, and guys like this
>>54775475 asshole if he's being serious.
Anyways, to actually address your post:
>I think when Bijou checks hereAs if...
>she'd be less likely to click a thread called /bj/ in case it's full of porn and degenerates. Instead she'd click /gem/, and then see it's full of porn and degenerateslmao, it's true that the people inside will be degenerates no matter what, so why not go with the joke name? Or that's my logic at least, since I sincerely doubt she'd come anywhere near 4chan anytime soon.
