>>1429124>>1428451>You're just conjecturing a theory you have from it.Ironic that you accuse him of this when it's literally the exact same thing you're doing. Your data says nothing about when the abuse occurred or who perpetrated it, only that person received it. Both of your arguments are complete conjecture unless the WHEN and WHO of the data are established. Stop acting like you're some paragon of research and reason when you fail to apply even basic scientific standards to the data you use for your arguments.