>>62761421>The point is there is a market for male vtuber.>>62761390>That doesn’t show that there isn’t a male vtuber market, it shows that the male fleshstreamer market is more viable.That's getting too silly. It is becoming a Mothy Python gag
>it is not there there is not a market for male vtubers, it is that doing ANYTHING ELSE is more viable including having no avatar and no image at all>but the male vtuber market is not dead, it is just pining for the fjordsThe whole reasoning for what
>>62761513 is implying is that
>there is a market for male vtubers, just debut more Kuzuhas and ToyasIf it was that simple the charts posted on
>>62760941 and
>>62759314 would look a lot different.
Let's narrow it a little bit
>Whatever market exists for male vtubers, it does not exist for male vtubers under COVER Corp.Here is a comparison to address he request by
>>62761248, the branch comparison between Hololive and Holostars.
>pic relatedHere are two takes from those numbers
1) HoloID girls have more hours watched with 10 girls than all 22 holostars combined
2) Pekora ALONE has more hours watched than all 22 holostars combined TWICE(!)
There is no market for male vtubers and SPECIALLY, there is no market for male vtubers under COVER Corp.
