>>49034432It seems extremely likely to me that False's source is Sayu herself.
Not only would she have a motive to do say so, it's nearly impossible to prove she leaked it as long as False protects his sources. But also even if it got out that she was the source, California law makes it so that employment information such as this can't be locked behind an NDA. Pic related is a case where Google got fucked for this exact thing.
