Anyways, w/r/t funds in general, one easy way to nerf them quickly would be the obvious tax hike. But they're already "gimped" in the sense that you need +~21% to break even on 10% buy + 10% sell. Anything else, like flat 20% buy, 0% sell, would just be shuffling the deck chairs around on the Titanic, but that example could technically reduce both how overbought coins get and how often it happens - and just move it over to how often they get oversold.
Not endorsing any of that, just spitballing.>>29951448>I also don't really know how stock market works, my best idea would be to look into real funds and how do they work, where they adapted like an exact match to nasfaq? Does that cause problems? And try to take it from there, but I'm no gamedev, I simply point out exploits and things that make me madReal mutual funds presumably pay less in brokerage fees than Joe Sixpack would trying to buy stocks, economy of scale, so that's somewhat accurate. I don't think it's quite as massive a difference as 10% vs. 225%
theoretical 50x by a player though. I also don't think it's worth trying to pigeonhole yourself into how "the real thing" works when it comes to nasfaq, if anything because the shares are infinite and can disappear into the void.
Real stocks
and by extension, mutual funds, as long as they're traded through individual shares can also undergo stock splits and reverse stock splits.
A stock split is exactly what it sounds like, one share becomes two (or more) and is now worth half (or less) what it used to be - grug pot worth same as before, but have more rocks in it now.
A reverse stock split is the opposite, two shares become one at double the price - grug pot worth same as before but have less rocks in it.
>>29952957It does get tiresome. Raymond James gets adjusted a lot more often than the others because it has more liquid though, and I don't always trade the same in it vs. the smaller ones. If someone else keeps trading in 桜靴下投資信託 then I'll probably leave that one alone.
