>>32240769Him or not, I will answer questions regarding /rose/ nonetheless. I agree the thread should lay off of him a little, but I do not see the usefulness in stating that it should stop. What reason do they have to listen? I would rather deprive them of acknowledgment until they wither.
>>32240889I see no issue here, it was a pleasure to work with you in the past and I’m sure that will continue to be the case in the future.
>>32240967Truth be told, I completely forgot about the story you are referring to.
