>>56152474>that's not going to happenWhat, /vr/ expanding what is allowed as Retro? It's already happened before, it is foolish not to think it will happen again.
>even if it happens we're not going to change our rulesIt wouldn't be changing the rules if the rule is just "the same as what is allowed on /vr/".
But really anon, I'm disappointed with you. I was setting up a joke for you with games for PS3 comment and you completely missed it.