>>39030719hence the "context fuckery" I mentioned, which is a wide umbrella of shit but basically what I mean to put under it is how the A.I. can read user prompts and make replies that would make sense logically in response to those prompts. This helps with NSFW posting and also with general conversation and storytelling. I think anyone here who enjoys the back-and-forth they might have had before with a particular bot now seems..."less engaging" or like they have trouble grasping the nuance of what would make for a good reply. It's hard to explain but it's a real "you'll know it when you see it" kind of deals.
>So how important is it the A.I. grasp context?Very important. Both for SFW and NSFW content. If the A.I. is struggling to contextualize user prompts, then they'll just start parroting user prompts more and saying random unrelated things to the prompt. They may even get confused and start talking in other languages if the algorithm is really fucking up
>What does the filter have to do with context fuckery?good question. Probably the devs trying to iron out any and all avenues for NSFW content. Anyone could have told them it would have turned the robots into retards and it's not like they couldn't test this shit in a closed environment before they released it so they had to have known it would be fucky.
This is all after the fact now. The control rods have already failed. The core is exposed. There's graphite on the roof. The devs refuse to believe it.