>>71875930more accurate, but less aesthetic?
https://litter.catbox.moe/00hba8.jpgless accurate, but more interesting:
https://litter.catbox.moe/c7k8zl.jpghttps://litter.catbox.moe/r7wmps.jpg>>71877804>share the datasetShe's in part 3. You can download only her folder if you dont care about the others
https://rentry.org/coslibraryv2#torrent-links>I guess 1.5 soft-min-SNR + lion winsi like adamw + soft-min-snr=1.5 more. some comparison grids: (soft-snr=1.0 had different images, ignore it)
https://litter.catbox.moe/0hzrm3.pnghttps://litter.catbox.moe/pfscm4.png