>>20270512Do you speak English, anon? I was pointing out precisely that one cannot know that it was a boyfriend and that it may have been something else, allowing gachikoi to cope because their romantic fantasy was not definitively disproven. Yet you get upset at me for pointing out this uncertainty and ambiguity, claiming that by doing so I am somehow pushing my own interpretation without knowing the facts, but not at the anon I responded to who presented the idea that it was her boyfriend as indisputable fact.