>>8686560Devchama here, it is part of the current considerations however, at the same time we have to consider this from a new player's position. If their net worth is low they won't be able to take advantage of this as much as people with high net worths meaning that it further spreads the gap between new players and older players. Obviously, dethroning the top top players is difficult already, we don't want to make it even harder.
>>8686618I mean, yeah, we could, but why? Just to provide users trading manually an advantage? Doesn't that just open us up to more players using 3rd party scripts in order to avoid that?
>>8686643Low hundreds to mid 1,000s I.E. around 200-1,500ish IIRC.
>>8686666Checked.