>>47710358No. You linked wikipedia as a source for your fucking opinion. You didn't link the primary sources. You linked wikipedia. Which tells me YOU didn't read the primary sources, and it's highly likely the people that wrote that wikipedia article didn't even read the primary sources. How many fucking times do you need to see a bullshit wikipedia article that either outright lies or does everything it can to obscure the truth just so they can jerk themselves off for being responsible for a wikipedia page? Stop reading that fucking propaganda. No conclusion penned on wikipedia has any credibility. Neither do the sources for that matter because the sources listed are always cherry picked by the people editing the article and they will NEVER list any sources that conflict with their chosen conclusion.