>>13644553fucking lmao. you're deflecting with extraneous whataboutism because you know actually answering the question would you prove you a retard either way. 'yes' would make you both an SJW or just generally retarded on how comedy as a whole works, 'no' would make you admit the obvious difference between joking about pedophlic acts and posting depictions pedophilic acts in earnest.
>strawmanthats not what this is you dumbass. dont throw out words you dont know how to use. its a perfectly comparable situation.
in fact, here's another one: if i joked about killing my mother-in-law because she got on my nerves today, that wouldn't be the same as me looking up instructions on how to do it.
you're being cognitively dissonant throughout this entire thing on purpose and arguing the same shit in a circle despite being presented several different angles on why you're wrong. Thank you for wasting my time with your voluntary retardation.
