>>57194673archiving purposes? i dunno, no real practical purpose really; personally I thought it was nice just seeing the wide variety of quotes that bakers used, and i remember seeing an anon asking for something like this a while back.
>>57194824is the anchor post the OP or the second post that follows? still new to the terminology
>>57194827and you know what, thanks for the answer! i didn't want to jump the gun and start adding unnecessary links, so i figured i'd ask if there'd be any interest in it in the first place
