>>43415738I'm the anon that counted the threads, I did use warosu... There was no better alternative and although the number is not exact it's a pretty good estimation. I counted all threads that had either "/hag/" or "hag thread" as the subject as well as threads that had "/hag/" or "hag thread" as the name, then I checked for bait/drama/not-actually-hag threads and subtracted them from the total count, if there's any better estimation we'll gladly take it though.