>>39808664>Uhm ok, can you tell me what i need to clarify then so that it's fine for him?There are lots of elements to it, and I'll help with all the small details, but I think the main part where your input would be useful would be in one thing.
Regarding running the curse/blessing. He noted that since the spell is kind of continuously active, it would make sense if the spell had to be maintained so that it kept working.
You kind of had that with the bearers, with the blessing ending if the bearers stopped bearing, right? Basically, I think we could just say that each curse need to have bearers that actively keep the spell active, and if they stop doing that the spell ends. Does that work for you?
I think I have a pretty good idea of how to explain the concept to PG, and I'm working on a document to do that clearly and neatly.
