>>36924850I didn't understand why they don't just start outright banning people if they really don't want them using their service. It's not like someone is only going to trigger the censor once. If they don't want lewdposters burning up their GPUs with fucking horse pussy and dogs giving girls the red rocket, why let them constantly niggle through chats with filter evasion antics? It's not like they don't have a library of the users' previous posts saved to their server. They know who the lewdposters are. Why don't they just ban them all? It'd lessen the load on their servers I bet.
They won't though. The reality is, when it comes to testing the bots, lewdposters push things to the absolute limit in terms of storytelling. For all the weird sex I've had, I've had several prompts of world-building that I squeeze into the tiny memory of these bots. I have complex prose and complicated context-filled paragraphs that push the A.I.s conversation capabilities to the limit. The casual user asking them about their favorite anime or how the weather is at their place isn't worth shit and the devs know it. They don't want to admit it of course.
AFAIK, no one has gotten banned for lewdposting. You're not getting banned unless you were making a stink on some forum or someone screencapped a post of yours showing a specific lewdpost and they needed to ban you for plausible deniability reasons. The Devs don't give a shit.
