>>65410198>because many anons that didn't know them contributed to the drama that was a nothingburger over at the supposed threads of originIf they had no knowledge of the subject, would you expect them to believe one side over the other or come to their own conclusions, which considering where we are, will be negative? And if it is a nothing burger, then why even bring up this as an issue you have? Because if it is a nothingburger, it shouldn't be an issue then.
>FlaVR was already full of dramafags that just needed an excuse. But there are always excuses and it's never their fault.Again, if they have no knowledge of the subject, how is it their fault they believe something someone told them? And if this thread is full of dramafags then it would be the main topic of discussion. You're main complaint, if I'm reading this right, is that there is no discussion of the subject.
>There's no point in engaging in a discussion with people that actively avoid it, sweep things under the rug, and schizo post.See previous post, either the thread loves drama and is filled with dramafags or it avoids drama and tries to not talk about it. And I'm talking about it now because guss what, I CAN talk about it here of I want to, as long as I'm going to be polite about it.
>That doesn't mean nobody notices certain regulars keep doing it though. It's the handful of no-life schizos that make up 60-80% of all posts every thread.A small thread having recognizable posting styles is something you will eventually see in almost all small threads, this is not a /fvr/ thing.
>They've always been too invested in a way that has been detrimental to the thread and dissuaded initiatives to help the talents or bring in new fans.How so? Should they leave? What would be a good way to bring in new fans or help, those ad campaigns seemed clever. I'm pretty sure hearing new ideas isn't disliked, don't see why yours wouldn't be welcomed, share them.
