>>25542830>presenting their data for multiple threads now against salamiso far the only data supposedly "against" her is heavy viewer churn from an opaque graph, which also had Chloe at 99% viewer churn. Giving us zero information.
From the same graph though, we can calculate viewer retention on her latest stream when compared to her first 5 streams -
> 503/5911 = 8.51% (Debut --> RE7 Part 7)> 1458/8887 = 16.41% (RE7 Part 1 --> RE7 Part 7)> 1699/7543 = 22.52% (RE7 Part 2 --> RE7 Part 7)> 1816/7748 = 23.44% (Euro Truck --> RE7 Part 7)> 2161/8934 = 24.19% (RE7 Part 3 --> RE7 Part 7)Which shows the following -
> she's getting about 7k to 8k unique viewers per stream.> the retention rate of these unique users keeps going up the more she streams.Typically for a generic debut (like Ranunculus) you'd see the numbers crash because the debut hype is dead and they didn't stand out from the crowd. Salome did, went viral, and so got more people to tune in.
Let's list out the "narratives" against her so far -
> consistent 90k CCV is unnaturalFrom existing data, yes. But she's not just another chuuba though. A unique set of circumstances caused her to have a lot of eyes on her during debut, and she took full advantage of it. Similar thing happened to Coco, getting regular 20k streams at fucking 6am JP time when everyone else was struggling to break 5k. All data including overlaps etc. so far seems to indicate that Salome captured a new audience.
> inb4 post 'emarchive reps
> botsZero proof so far other than some retarded headcanon. Graphs are smooth, VODs are mostly between 600k to 1M range, natural numbers. Comments also line up. Not to mention twitter stuff and fan content.
> do you believe youtube numbersYes, until proven otherwise. Because that premise also involves doubting every other streamer's numbers as well, which doesn't really add to the discussion. Similar to how "everyone else is lying about literally everything else other than me" is nothing but cope if there's nothing to back it up.
