>>73876645I broke down everything you said to explain why your entire propaganda is wrong and weak:
>So why is EVERYONE here so sure she was completely innocent?Using "completely" to subtly require absolutism. A strong tactic to open up with to not only get others to doubt them themselves but also request more burden of proof from the other side. It's not about who is completely right but who is more right and less wrong. But this is just a statement to require her to be an absolute saint.
>Why does everyone just believe her and assume people were bullying her to death in Nijisanji?
This is just implying people believe her blindly to fit your narrative.
>Have you never encountered a person with a victim complex in your lives? Have you never had an experience with someone who thought they were getting bullied just because multiple people disagreed with them?This is implying "something happens in the world so that must be the case for her" to fit your narrative. But there is nothing backing this up.
>I don't know, it just seems really weird to me in a situation this opaque and ambiguous that you would agree with every narrative that makes the people you like look good and the people you dislike look bad.Another cope that just strawmans everyone you dislike as people who do it just because they like/ dislike someone.
>Dramafags? bad unless they're making shit up about NijisanjiThis is your claim that dramafags are bad. This is basically you complaining people make exceptions to your claim when it only counts as an exception if they break their own rules, not your.
>Dunking on dramafags? Good unless it harms the narrative Are you that eager to swallow propaganda?Basically more baseless claim like above. Just because you will like / dislike a certain person irregardless on everything they do does not mean people will do the same. There is nothing wrong with liking and disliking different things they say. There is no proof of this hidden narrative and propaganda you claim.
