>>73361223Not really. The reason why takedowns are so easy to do is because Youtube wants to preserve its safe harbor status, so it's argued that while its impossible for them to auto-remove all infringing content, they can make a very strong good faith effort to do so by responding to complaints (with a heavy bias towards the complainer). And part of that is the automated takedown system, which is 'unfair', but in a way that the copyright owner side has no incentive to complain and the content creator side has no power to, because there are remediation procedures.
This will still happen and the three strikes policy is still there, which is what Cover is most afraid of - not breaking the law, but enough strikes making it so that a holo essentially can never stream on Youtube again. It's indirectly legally related, but more so directly Youtube-policy related.
So arguably it is possible that doing unarchived games might work because its sort of difficult to complain about content that is already not on the platform, and Youtube can't issue a strike for an already removed video. If the claim is already in progress, removing the video will not remove the strike, though.
