>>76520078>"they are drawings"I understand your argument that you say that they are exactly drawings. But I've heard that excuse before when talking to someone who shares similar tastes in this thread.
Everyone knows that all art that the same creator makes is the artistic representation of the same reality with which that same creator is based to make his work.
I will ask you one thing: What is the artistic representation that the author of that art himself portrays in his drawing? What is it based on? You could say and excuse yourself "Huh. It's based on an anime character." If so: "What is that anime character based on?"
You may be right in the fact that he has no real victims. But that art is based on the reality of the victims who have suffered these abuses. Therefore, knowing that there are artists who charge for making this type of art, is it okay to profit financially from the suffering of real victims? Shadman did that kind of art. How would you defend that?
>"Just like when you play CoD, you're not killing people, you're playing a game, which is fiction"Fallacy of false equivalence: People play games simply because video games are only recreational activities that in many cases stimulate areas of the brain that in real life can be used for personal benefit. A strategy game, for example, can benefit you in organizing your schedules when you have to go to university, or to work, or both. In Latin America there are many kids who study and work at the same time.
Although CoD does not have those advantages, at least it serves only as recreational entertainment. You don't play the game because it makes you morbid about what's in its content. You play CoD because you want to feel like you're a soldier and that's it. There's nothing wrong with that.
On the other hand, the lolicon has none of the advantages that I just mentioned. The main reason a person watches it is to satisfy his fetishistic needs (not to mention that it's an escapist fantasy where you play a criminal...).
>"There's current problems they could better direct their focus on, like LITERAL children being groomed by troons, getting told that they should take hormone injections, and being coerced into genital mutilation."I feel like many of you use that excuse to escape an argument. but I will give you the floor:
Obviously ALL the problems you mentioned are bad and have nothing to justify. But just because that's bad doesn't take away from the fact that lolicon has strong and sick themes. The good thing is that on the internet there are many people who expose these degenerates on networks and make their lives a misery. It is a relief that there are good caring souls. Regarding the replacement of genitals, the cases of grooming in spic lands, and the other problems that you talked about are also bad and I do not justify them. But those are more political issues that come to this topic of conversation.