>>11727805Here. I'll disprove it.
There are two main claims made by a sketchy website in 2015 that propelled this rrat: one, that the necklace Miko and Momo (the FC2 streamer) were the same; and two, that their voices sounded clearly to be exactly the same. It's worth noting that these were the claims made by the website often used as the source of the rrat, so if either claim is off it falls apart.
The first claim is the necklace. To the Meido様s in this thread, please don't bonk me, this is just necklace pics of the FC2 streamer momo-chan spoiler tagged and not a Vtuber's past life so don't kill me. I took these images directly from the video, which I have. If you notice, the necklace looks like an opal(? moon? white oval?) and this is noticeable if you actually have the video and screenshot it when it's near the camera. The image commonly used for the rrat is much lower quality and bad lighting so you can't see the white. Meanwhile, the necklace Miko wears is heart shaped. You can sort of make it out in the low quality image that goes around now, but it's confirmed because 5ch users in 2015 also noticed how Miko's is actually heart shaped while she was streaming. This confirms they are two different shapes and blows the first piece of evidence the article claimed as true.
The second piece of evidence is their voices are clearly the same. If you listen to the video, which was the one commonly posted on differing porn websites back in the day (hard to find a copy now but there are English speakers with copies in places), Momo barely makes any noise throughout but when she does she does not sound anything like Miko. Miko has had her distinctive baby voice her entire career and while she was streaming back then. Now, it doesn't matter if Miko could've been faking a voice, because the nikosoku article claimed the voices during Momo's livestream and Miko's livestream were the exact same to the point that someone recognized Momo as Miko before Miko revealed her face on niconico, when the voices in reality are clearly distinct and nothing alike. The article which originated and propagated the rrat straight up lied and therefore is worthless. Both the necklace claim and the voice claim used as definitive evidence by the article that made the rrat were lies.
So there. That's your disproof. The original article is worthless, they didn't have the same necklace, they don't have the same voice, the most that's similar is they have black hair and bangs, but there are actually other nico nico streamers that match Momo-chan more in looks anyway so that point is worthless.
There. It's false. It's disproven. They're different people. If you want any more rigor in the disproof do your reps yourself because this is the most I'll babysit you.
