>>14330594Serious answer, those people don't get noticed because going after individual streamers doesn't necessarily pay off. Going after the platform as a whole, or using mass reports to pressure the platform, or going after *a specific company* like, say, Cover/Hololive. That could have money in it.
Last year there was some big shit on Twitch with hundreds of streamers receiving DMCA takedowns for VOD and clip content (DMCA notices/takedowns are different than copyright claim or live restriction that YT does automatically - DMCA notices are not allowed to be fully automated). Since then the general wisdom on Twitch is if you play copyrighted music or even do something like *walk past* copyrighted music on the street, you risk some record label or their contractors using autodetection software on you, then using that information to fill out a DMCA notice. If you get three of those in 90 days your Twitch account is permanently banned. Twitch streamers often delete their VODs and disallow clips or delete clips after 24-48h, but the fact is music companies can hit live streams too. Here's a timestamp video of the software these people use, it can has literal live detection capabilities.
https://youtu.be/t44WxC2QUQs?t=267The reason this doesn't happen is because the music companies want Twitch/Amazon to pay them money like YT does via copyright claim system, so they go radio silent for months to years then send out a massive wave of hundreds to thousands of DMCA notices all at once to get streamers to put pressure on Twitch to do something. Everyone blatantly playing copyrighted music can get instantly fucked the moment they've done it 3 times in 90 days, they just don't because the big payday for the music companies isn't there. Hell, even individuals with, say, youtube channels, could technically DMCA someone who reacted to their content 3 times and get them permabanned.
