>>16173907>Cover seems to be against the idea of streams they can't profit off ofIt's not profit, it's the potential of getting copyright striked. Just because a stream doesn't get a strike when it's non-monetized and unarchived, doesn't mean that:
1) Youtube's video matching DMCA system didn't figure out what it was a stream of
2) Youtube never changes policies regarding unarchived videos being copyright striked
3) That a company that does own the rights to what was streamed never does a copyright strike, something that can happen very easily with the current automated systems available
4) That some future covercorp employee doesn't accidentally unarchive or put monetization on the video, leading to the video being open for strikes
