>>16840621>One is that people can form their own opinions on something even if the post their reading obviously has a slanted bias.Now let's go back to what I said in an earlier comment
>biased interpretations of a videoAnd that other anon replied
>I don't know how direct quotes are biased interpretationsYou jumped in to agree with a statement that was an implicit lie. Of course I'm gonna accuse you of not reading the fucking chain. If you want to argue against my initial point, that's one thing. But don't act like that's what you were initially claiming. Anyways
>One is that people can form their own opinions on something even if the post their reading obviously has a slanted bias.Most anons are too lazy to watch a 12 minute video of some dude they don't like and thus will rely solely on the summary, especially when it's a summary that breaks down multiple quotes. Secondly, this whole board suffers from a huge case of confirmation bias. If you offer a narrative that aligns with people's beliefs, they are more likely to believe it and will be biased against anything that goes against their beliefs
>Second, I have no fucking power as an anonymous user on 4chan. I am not looking to get popular off of the drama that I might talk about. I'm here to just talk about it. These fags use that drama to propel their channel and it's leaking into content I like, so I'm gonna have a fucking opinion on it.Never said that I had any problem with someone having an opinion. However the creator of that thread clearly had a purpose in mind. It's very obvious when anons are trying to keep a rrat alive or trying to stir up drama.
