>>16978600because getting into the argument would require her to badmouth the company another way. The only way to refute what he said is to point to a holo that debuted to a big audience, turned out to be shit, and hard reclined. Saying so would be badmouthing that specific holo.
Convo would basically go like this
>Once you're in hololive you're set, you don't need to be a good streamer etc.>But if you aren't a good streamer you'll lose viewers after debut>Not necessarily, if you're barely competent and have a good model people will watch you anyway. (Optional: burn all bridges with HL and name... idk take your pick)Only option here is to point at one of the holos who failed/is failing and burn her own opportunity.
At least by changing the subject she points out to him that he's towing the line and he backpedals a little and says "Once you have the job, it doesn't matter what was on your CV if you can do the job"
