>>18285527>Sounds like something a tradcuck or christfag would say, minus the worship of meek and weak and humility.That might as well be the case, but I fail to see how approaching the situation from a direction of intellectual scepticism - that is essentially nihilistic - improves things.
You can of course assert that nothing means anything and gloat at the silly men dying for ideas, but ultimately, it is the men willing to die for ideas that shape the flow of history. Those who are willing to sacrifice themselves on the altar of the nation, or their gods, will triumph over those that lack such convictions.
>>18285606The critique of Christian morality is legitimate. Christian morality is ultimately the morality of the downtrodden, not of the princes. Just like the Liberalism gives rise to a bourgeois morality. Not to mention that Spengler was not opposed to religion or religiosity at all, so you clearly haven't read him.
