>>19071497Not that anon, but they are not wrong to point out that NDAs tend to have a time component. For example, I was privy to a merger offer at a company I worked at once. It didn't end up happening, but I was legally bound to not discuss its existence or details for 3 years, even though it ended up being a "nothingburger", as the kids say. It could also be indefinite. I do not know whether indefinite nondisclosure is legal in Japan, it would not surprise me given how
corpo-friendly their legal system is.
I agree with you. It is not likely. That does not mean that a non-disclosure clause does not exist.
>>19071542BA JI RI SU KU TA I MU !!
