>>19836274Its possible that they'll die down but as of right now there's no indication of such and since holox has stayed top earners until now, with vox beating them, there's a good chance that if the pattern remains the same, Luxiem will be more successful than Holox.
>>19836290no where does she state they've made just as much but if you do look at the statistics per month, luxiem is more successful. They've had less time to earn money comparatively and come from a company that hasn't had the same amount of success in the west prior to Luxiem. But if the trend continues they'll overall be more successful in general and not just on a month to month basis
>>19836550I literally never stated anything about nijiJP. It's great that Chloe is doing well but statistics indicate that vox will overtake her.
>>19836131Poorer overall? Sure. They've been debuted for less than 3 months but that's likely to change sooner rather than later seeing as nijisanji has both streamlabs and superchats and en has had several sponsored streams in the past few months alone. While luxiem hasn't had one yet, companies would be idiotic not to sponsor Luxiem/Vox.
