>>20268296You argue like an absolute autist
>>20268313Ok, this is my problem with the whole thing: it's disingenuous to say we never shared a thread with them, because we the people of /hlgg/ back then used to share the thread with the people of /hlg/ back then. That's what happens during a split: a chunk of the overall group, who shared the thread with the rest of the group, leaves.
To say we never shared a thread with them is arguing a specific definition of >we
The thread wasn't entirely new after Myth debuted, even if we did get an influx of new users. Users who were in /hlg/ pre-split were still there, like myself.