>>22712125>you're wrong, and thats just how it is.I don't know what fantasy world you're living in where competition is good for companies.
>you're lazy, and you want other faggots to be as lazy as you.Where did I say I want others to be lazy?
>that make sense to anyone and everyoneIf competition being good for companies makes so much sense to everyone why does every company in the world do everything they can to avoid it?
You're the one looking dumb saying having stupid nonsensical shit.
Do you also think they should cut their talents' earnings in half so they have to work twice as hard would be great for the talents?
>>22712536>Competition means more choice/varietyYes that's true, but irrelevant because the company doesn't care how much choice you have, in fact they want you to have less choice so you chose them. How is that hard to understand?
>them actually working hard in putting out contentThat's a negative for them, they don't magically become better at working hard and putting out content because they have competition, they're forced to do that to keep their place in the market.
>You can only be a Monopoly for so long before you become complacent and stagnate.Why do you think that is? Because they get to become complacent and stagnate and still make the same amount of money, which is their goal, not to give consumers the best experience out of the kindness of their hearts. If it was they wouldn't become complacent and stagnate by being a monopoly.
>you refuse to get it or pay attention then that's on you. Not me.It is in fact you that refuses to get it or pay attention.
