>>24505230>would never talk about things you don't fully understand?
before that: most of what I was saying had the quality that a vaccine discussion on vt deserves. That is to say, null. I do know a few things about psychology, incidentally, not that it matters in this case. But I wanted for the sake of clarity clarify that while I do like saying that my iq is 135, I'm aware and concur that iq is not a relevant measure of intelligence. I could be iq150 and be stupid as shit. But, again, this was a shit throwing contest. About actual DK I know very little, but the general cognitive bias, the fact that ignorant people believe themselves way more knowledgeable than they are is apparent. This dude is reading news articles on pol and thinks himself a free thinker. That's ridiculous.
>People make weighted risks in their interpretations of the facts all the time just like you doThat's my point. From the get go. You can't know shit, so you need to rely on what others tell you they believe. You can chose who you think is reasonable and sounds well informed and coherent. For me that's the people who built the city in living in, who designed the phone I'm using right now. I trust my friends who are actual scientists and have nuanced an critical takes on a lot of things, the vaccine included. The spergs shouting "jew vaccine" bullshit are deciding to trust random people on the internet. The same ilk of internet folk that believed that trump was still in power, or some myriad of other absolutely incoherent conspiracy theories. So while I can agree that at the end of the day neither of us can know shit, im still pretty damn sure that my reasoning is stronger. They're obsessed with the fucking jews for God's sake, it's beyond moronic. You sound reasonably articulate, so please use your brain. If you don't like the vaccine you might have reasonable reasons for that but distance yourself from the poltards.
