>>26335423>Pomu better pray she wasn't underagedhonestly the fact she did it as a child is saving her from the nudes being plastered all over, even with the freedom of 4chans anonymity, theyre still subject to laws and no one is allowed to upload it.
> she could get charged with distributing child porn.thats not how it works anon, the archives and those posting it would be more likely to be subject to the charges then she would be because she would at most get a slap on the wrist if they knew about it at the time.
>>26335599>>26335668its context sensitive, i remember there was a case about how a underage couple posted theyre sex tape hoping to get famous and were charged.
though i think it was because the guy wasnt underage anymore or something like that.
